Challenge Result

** Category BS: basic category

The challengers compete in the total time to find all supernova candidates. There is no restriction on programming language and distributed computing middleware. Any failure during the execution is not assumed in this category.

Winner is Ibis Stargazers from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Congratulation!

RankEntry NameTeam NameMembersTime (second)
1dach004Ibis StargazersJason Maassen, Frank Seinstra (Vrije Univ)2192
2dach005NCHCWei-cheng Hung, Chang-Hsing Wu, Te-Min Chen, Yao-Tsung Wang, Yi-Lun Pan, Hsi-En Yu, Hui-Shan Chen, Kuo-Yang Cheng (NCHC)3670
3dach000HitoritabiYasuhito Takamiya, Yasuo Itabashi (NEC)4783
4dach006TaurinShota Yoshitomi, Ken Hironaka, Hideo Saito (Univ Tokyo)6310
5dach001IbisNovaeKees van Reeuwijk (Vrije Univ)8422
6dach007matsulabKento Sato, Tomoaki Hamano, Yuya Watanabe, Rio Kokubu, Hitoshi Sato (Tokyo Tech)15025
7dach008The Empress and the HermitMasahiro Nakamura, Kohei Hiraga, Katsunori Suzuki (Univ Tsukuba)55127
(6167)
8dach009ekrElzbieta Krepska (Vrije Univ)
8dach012Masters of OrionBogdan Nicolae (Univ Rennes I)

** Category FT: fault tolerant category

The challengers compete in the total time to find all supernova candidates under a scenario of artificial node failure. Some processes will be killed according to the failure scenario. Although a trial scenario is prepared, a scenario for the challenge is not provided until the final measurement. There is no restriction on programming language and distributed computing middleware as the Category BS.

Winner is IbisNovae from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Congratulation!

RankEntry NameTeam NameMembersTime (second)
1dach001IbisNovaeKees van Reeuwijk (Vrije Univ)2941